Using these rates is certainly fair considering that their proposal includes the elimination of public schools from Buckhead. But I would just point out that the stated reasons for secession are centered around the city government, namely the Mayor, the City Council, and the recent issues concerning the city's budget. The Mayor and the Council have no control over the taxes paid to the schools - that is controlled by the School Board.
Eliminating public schools is an entirely different matter from seceding from the City, and it clouds the basic argument concerning city services. When you consider the fact that every other new city on the list above has continued to pay for public schools, and it is clear that we do not have an apples-to-apples comparison. A much fairer comparison would be to look at the taxes saved just from seceding from the city to establish a new city with a lower municipal tax rate.
Such a comparison would look something like this:
Millage Rate | |||
Proposed | Apples-to-Apples | Current rate | |
City millage | 4.69 | 4.69 | 9.35 |
School millage | 0 | 21.64 | 21.64 |
County millage | 10.281 | 10.281 | 10.281 |
State millage | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
Total millage | 15.221 | 36.861 | 41.521 |
On the far right is the current tax rate, using the actual taxes proposed for 2008 for the City, School, and County. On the far left is the rate for the City of Buckhead. In the middle is the tax rate for the City of Buckhead using existing school rates and the new municipal rate from the FCTF. As you can see, it is pretty much in line with the other "new cities", and is even higher than Sandy Springs.
Using these numbers, the actual overall tax reduction for the new city is only 11.2%, or 4.66 mills. This is a far cry from the 50% reduction in taxes shouted by the FCTF.
In fairness, the FCTF rates are accurate if you assume that you both secede from the city and eliminate public schools, and a 4.69 millage rate is indeed 50% less than the current city millage rate of 9.35 mills. I am not accusing the FCTF of lying or of erroneous math. I just think they are not presenting an accurate comparison.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.